06/23/2009
Rebecca Lowry

Wendy and Wame discuss logistics |
It was wonderful to arrive in Botswana to warm welcomes and optimism, but how do we know that what we’re aiming to do will be useful, long-lasting, efficient? I have to admit I’ve been plagued by these fundamental questions since I first contemplated Setso Project back in 2005. By that time I had lived with a host family that scraped by on one meager salary for a 10 person household, and I had volunteered with a number of small-scale NGOs that struggled to deliver core services to families and individuals underserved, or altogether unreached, by government funded programs. From this vantage point, I saw gaping needs and also a simple response: to leverage the charity of individuals in the US through an online donation mechanism. I could think of countless friends and family members who would contribute and I thought, just as Americans can make $20 donations to the Red Cross or Save the Children, why can’t we facilitate the same kind of frequent and small acts of generosity in support of Botswana’s struggling NGOs?
That was more than three years ago. Since that time, a growing corps of Setso Project advisors and I have continued to struggle with increasingly nuanced questions of feasibility, efficiency, utility and accountability. It’s difficult for me to admit how much time has passed, but the reality is that three years later I still don’t know the answer to these core questions. I’ve gone through numerous iterations of giving up, renewing faith, accepting half measures and giving up again. Nevertheless, with each round, I seem to gain a clearer understanding of our aims and the barriers that stand in the way. I believe my partners have also experienced these same ups and downs and this recent visit to Botswana (we sit on the plane on the last leg of our journey home) is just another step in the process of discovering.

Tom teaches the art of scrimshaw |
So what of utility? Is what we’re aiming to do useful? The short answer is we don’t know and we may never know. As someone who has worked for 6 plus years in the field of economics research, most recently for a firm (Innovations for Poverty Action) that scientifically evaluates impacts of social welfare programs, I have come to accept that a controlled experiment, with a large enough sample, is the best way to measure the impact of a development program. But there is room for involvement in the development challenge on all levels. Researchers, like those at IPA, need inputs/ideas/practices to test , just as we, as practitioners, need proven solutions to implement. To the extent that answers are available on what works in development, we will incorporate them (see IPA, FAI and JPAL websites to learn about what we know works). And where answers don’t exist, we will use our intuition as well as guidance from potential beneficiaries to make our best guess at useful interventions. I don’t think intuition alone is a good idea for multi-million or –billion dollar development budgets I think it’s the best we’ve got for filling in large gaps with small funding while we wait for more definitive answers.
And efficiency? As someone trained in economics, the question of efficiency plagues me. Are we doing the most we can with the money we have? With about $10,000 annually, much of it coming from friends, family and my own pocket, I think the question of efficiency is somewhat negligible at this point. At the moment we have one paid staff member who is paid out of my pocket (donations please :)) and nominal other administrative expenses. The rest goes to program expenses. Period. In the future, we hope to have ongoing support for administrative expenses as well but thus far we have tried our best to put every dollar of donations into projects on the ground.
How about accountability? This may be the hardest question of all. First of all, it requires some knowledge of what should be done. And as the discussion of utility argues, we’re a far cry from knowing what works in development in general. The question also queries ‘accountable to whom?’ - to local beneficiaries? To donors? To local governing institutions? My experience working with NGOs in Botswana tells me that charitable initiatives will fail if they lack any of the following: the buy-in of local government and community representatives, diversity of inputs (ideas as well as resources), and sustainable (often external) financial support. To these ends, our recent visit attempted to secure the necessary inputs. We met with local government (both the traditional chief and the local schools, social services and development committees) and brainstormed ways of raising funds both locally and internationally.
For Tom and Wendy, this trip to Botswana was the first exposure to the difficulties of the development work we aim to facilitate. I believe they experienced what I first experienced in 2005 – an overwhelming sense of need and a dearth of tools to address those needs. But they were also buoyed by the experience of meeting with like-minded individuals – social workers, community development council members, young entrepreneurs, and researchers who all, despite an overwhelming shortage of resources, believe in the ability to make progress.
| Notes from the Airplane - Part 2 |
06/23/2009
Wendy Lewis

Two women show off the jewelry they've made |
Three hours of flight left on this trip. I wanted to get some thoughts down before being swept up in the demands of homecoming and "life as we know it". These past 10 days in Botswana have been a hugh departure from that life.
Being on the ground... between meeting our day to day needs of traveling in a challenging environment/culture to the wakeful nights of questioning the value/impact of moving Setso Project's work forward to meet those challenges, it was easy to miss the bigger picture. A quick replay of one of many times we were received by the friends and contacts Becca has developed over these many years of working on Setso, serves as a powerful reminder of why we were there.
A red-head in Botswana is notable, but a red-head who is so dear to so many and who speaks for Setso's work so eloquently, always with sensitivity toward the perspective of her audience is something I want to give equal weight to as we ask ourselves those questions Becca has put forth above. I can't promise that what we are doing is sustainable, efficient etc, but the words that keep buzzing around my brain are "simple joys". Everywhere we made contact we were met with faces that registered "simple joys", no small thing in the challenging lives of those whom Setso attempts to support through our projects.
I can't know where we will be 5 years from now. If we can continue to raise small donations from family and friends by you remembering Setso Project at birthdays and holidays that would be terrific. If we can find large foundations and donors willing to join us... even more terrific! What I do know, after this trip, is that the people Becca has put in place for Setso Project have what it takes to guide us successfully into that future and that the network we established in our 10 day visit is strong and excited to be working with us. From the village chief to the teachers, social workers and Otse staff, we are in good company.
So, as we wend our way into Setso's future, "simple joys" will be enough for me and I hope, through these photos, you will be able to share some of that joy and pride knowing that your financial and emotional support made these smiles shine through.
|